II. Use standardized labels, or create descriptive labels
In a later module, we will cover controlled vocabularies and labelling schemas in detail. Using standard labels will help your data be interoperable, meaning, making it easier for your data to be used and re-used in more or additional future applications. This is especially helpful for datasets. If you end up wanting to compare your dataset to another dataset, it will be a faster and easier process if you used a standardized name for your variables, including a standardized format–such as surface_temp_avg_degree_C to refer to the average temperature of the ocean surface in degrees Celsius. If both of your datasets have the same variable names it is much easier to use various softwares to compare and graph the two datasets.
However, if you do not know the standardized labels or they do not have them, then: it is better to be overly detailed, but contextually clear, than under-detailed. Data should ideally be able to be parsed from sight alone, to someone of the relevant background, without the additional context of having to double-check with you. So, it is far better to name a data column a long title such as ‘wind speed at 3 am in North End Halifax’ than to name it ‘wind 3’ just to get it shorter. It is also better to be overly detailed if it means it will be contextually clear, and there will be no misunderstanding what the data is. This level of detail will make it easier to do standardization later.
Standardized and detailed labels will also help you in the future, if you come back to research that you did! Especially if you wanted to show the research to someone else, or had to explain it to a potential employer or post-secondary application.